© 2024 Ideastream Public Media

1375 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44115
(216) 916-6100 | (877) 399-3307

WKSU is a public media service licensed to Kent State University and operated by Ideastream Public Media.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

The U.S. Supreme Court Will Determine If Purges of Infrequent Ohio Voters is Constitutional

photo of US Supreme Court banner
U.S. Supreme Court

The fight over how Ohio has maintained its voter rolls has made it to the nation’s highest court.

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case involving the removal from Ohio's voter rolls people who haven’t cast a ballot for six years. Secretary of State Jon Husted is happy about that. 

“We think it’s great news because it’s going to give us a chance to validate that Ohio is following the rules for how you are supposed to maintain voter rolls.”

Back in the fall, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the state’s process for clearing ineligible voters, saying it punished inactive voters.  It’s a criticism Husted isn’t willing to accept.

“For 20 years, Ohio has used the process spelled out in the national Voting Rights Act that says that we follow this process. If you don’t vote for two years, we send out a postcard in an attempt to connect to you to see if you still want to be registered to vote and to vote at the address you are registered at.

"If you do not respond and you do not vote for another four years, for a total of six years, then we remove you from the voter rolls. That’s what the Ohio law says. That’s what the federal law says.”

But Freda Levenson, the legal director for the Ohio ACLU, says that’s not what federal law allows. She says it’s a form of voter suppression. And she says that’s why the appeals court ruled against the state last fall.

“The 6th Circuit’s enjoining of Ohio’s improper practices allowed more than 7,500 Ohioans to cast a ballot in the last federal election. What’s at stake here is that decision.”

'There's nothing about the right to vote that says, 'Use it or lose it.'

The state was required to allow those removed voters to cast ballots in the 2016 election. And Levenson says she thinks the Supreme Court will uphold the lower court’s decision. 

“There’s nothing about the right to vote that says ‘use it or lose it.’ And, in fact, the NVRA, also called "motor voter," specifically says that failure to vote cannot be a reason to deny a person the right to vote. We’re talking here about people who are still eligible. They live in Ohio. They haven’t registered elsewhere. They are still alive.”

Husted says this policy has removed more than 560,000 dead voters from the rolls since he took office as Secretary of State back in 2010. And he says the policy has removed more than 1.6 million voters who had duplicate registrations on file.

Husted says it’s important for him to be able to continue the policies that he was using because proper maintenance of voter rolls means fewer Ohioans will have trouble casting a ballot. Husted says it should be easy to vote but hard to cheat. But critics say he's unfairly putting up barriers to qualified voters.

Jo Ingles is a professional journalist who covers politics and Ohio government for the Ohio Public Radio and Television for the Ohio Public Radio and Television Statehouse News Bureau. She reports on issues of importance to Ohioans including education, legislation, politics, and life and death issues such as capital punishment. Jo started her career in Louisville, Kentucky in the mid 80’s when she helped produce a televised presidential debate for ABC News, worked for a creative services company and served as a general assignment report for a commercial radio station. In 1989, she returned back to her native Ohio to work at the WOSU Stations in Columbus where she began a long resume in public radio.