May 27, 2015   School Closings
Listen Live WCPN / WCLV
Mission 4
Values 1
Values 2
Values 3
Vision 3
Vision 4
Vision 5
Values 4
Values 5
Values 6
Vision 1
Vision 2

Choose a station:

90.3 WCPN
WCLV 104.9
WVIZ/PBS

Supreme Court Says Locals Can Make Pill-Makers Pay For Drug Disposal

Tuesday's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to not review an ordinance passed by Alameda County, California, means that drug makers will now need to pay for collection and disposal of unused drugs in the county.

Many of us have old prescription drugs sitting around in medicine cabinets — so what's the best way to get rid of them?

Some folks simply toss old pills in the garbage, or down the toilet.

Both of those options can lead to medications in the ocean, bays or rivers. Three years ago Alameda County, across the bay from San Francisco, became the first county in the nation to require pharmaceutical manufacturers to pay for safe disposal of prescription drugs. Drug companies sued and lost in lower courts. Tuesday the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the case, meaning that drug makers will now need to pay for collection and disposal of unused drugs.

"I think that this is an important step forward for protecting our marine resources as well as our drinking water," says Miriam Gordon with Clean Water Action, an advocacy group.

Actually, the FDA says it's OK to flush many kinds of old pills down the toilet. Regulators say the risk that kids or pets will get into medicine left around the house is much worse than any impact on our water.

Still, Art Shartsis, an attorney representing Alameda County, says the drug disposal law costs pharmaceutical companies very little to implement.

"Drugs are dangerous in a home where you have elderly people who lose track of what they're doing, and where you have others – children — in the house," he says. "There are health, safety and environmental problems."

Attorney Richard Semp, with the Washington Legal Foundation, is a strong opponent of the drug disposal law. He calls it "selfish," because it forces others to pay for something that should be paid for locally, and says it also interferes with interstate commerce.

"The whole point of the Commerce Clause is that we have one national economy," he says. "If you had every jurisdiction around the country trying to impose its waste disposal costs on other jurisdictions, it would lead to chaos."

Semp says Tuesday's Supreme Court decision could ultimately be the law's undoing, as other counties around the nation pass similar laws and are sued.

"If, at the end of the day, you have conflicting lower court decisions, then almost surely the U.S. Supreme Court will have to jump in," he says.

San Francisco and San Mateo counties now have similar drug disposal laws, with dozens of locations to drop off old pills. Other California counties, including Los Angeles and Santa Barbara, are looking into it.

Meanwhile, most states have some sort of legislation, enacted or in the works, that encourages the reclamation and, in some cases, recycling of many types of leftover medication. And the federal Drug Enforcement Agency has sponsored take-back programs, in conjunction with some local law enforcement agencies, to help get expired or unused pain medication that has the potential for abuse off the streets.

This story was produced by State of Health, KQED's health blog.

Copyright 2015 KQED Public Media. To see more, visit http://www.kqed.org.