Apr. 24, 2014   54°F   School Closings
Listen Live WCPN / WCLV
ideastream
Mission 4
Values 1
Values 2
Values 3
Vision 3
Vision 4
Vision 5
Values 4
Values 5
Values 6
Vision 1
Vision 2

Choose a station:

90.3 WCPN
WCLV 104.9
WVIZ/PBS

Choose a station:

90.3 WCPN
WCLV 104.9
WVIZ/PBS

Energy Efficiency Advocates Say Revising Ohio’s Renewables Policy Hurts Investment

Tuesday, September 24, 2013 at 5:07 PM

Share on Facebook Share Share on Twitter Tweet

In the last five years, significant investments have been made in Ohio to develop renewable energy. Advocates say this is because of the standards implemented by state lawmakers. Statehouse correspondent Andy Chow says there’s now a proposal to reform those measures. It’s a plan that some believe will negatively impact the market.

The Ohio Senate has been holding long, comprehensive meetings to review the state’s renewable and efficient energy policies. This effort is led by Republican Senator Bill Seitz, from the Cincinnati area, who says it’s time to take a look back at the standards and measures created in 2008 and find out if they are helping the state.

Advocates for wind energy arrived at the Statehouse Tuesday to send a clear message that these policies are indeed beneficial to Ohio.

Eric Thumma was one of them. He’s a director with Iberdrola Renewables which operates the large Blue Creek Wind Farm in Van Wert and Paulding counties.

“We’re meeting the renewable portfolio standard benchmarks on time,” Thumma says. “And we’re doing it in a very cost effective manner.”

Thumma says the initiatives put in place by the Ohio General Assembly are effective.  “There really isn’t anything for the folks in this building to change. Just stick with what’s working and we’ll keep building and bringing projects and investments to Ohio.”

A report released by the Ohio Advanced Energy Economy Institute backs up Thumma’s assessment and says there would be a huge hike in electric bills if the energy standards are gutted.

According to the report conducted by the Ohio State University’s Center for Resilence, Ohioans would pay $3.6 billion more if that were to happen.

Senator Seitz makes it clear that his bill will reform and not repeal the state’s standards. The major concern from Thumma and others in the renewable energy community deals with the proposed elimination of the “Buy Ohio” provision.  The provision says at least 50% of renewable energy in a portfolio must come from in-state.

Seitz says he’s proposing to take out this provision because of U.S. Supreme Court decisions against similar policies in other states.

But Thumma argues that the “Buy Ohio” initiative drives investment and ensures that ratepayer money is going back to Ohio communities. He’s pleading with policymakers to avoid changing the provision and instead stay the course.

“When a state puts in place a renewable energy standard like Ohio has done, they’re creating a market,” Thumma says. “And like all markets today, these markets have rules, every market in the U.S. has some set of rules. And so when you change those rules you change the market dynamics. And so that’s a challenge for us since we’re asked to participate and compete in a market environment, we can only do that if we know that the rules are certain and stable.”

Still, Seitz says this will even the playing field among investors in Ohio and those in other states. “The only reason they would be hurt is because their prices are consistently higher than out of state wind and solar resources, so I guess they’re gonna have to get a little bit more cost-competitive. They enjoy super competitive profits because we have this requirements that insulates them against competition.”

Dayna Baird with the American Wind Energy Association says the state has already approved seven wind farm projects that are now in the pipeline for construction, and another five or six with applications pending. Baird says playing with the state’s renewable portfolio standards--also known as RPS--can impact the leaders of such projects.

“There have been some tinkering and changes around the edges nearly every year so it certainly does make investment a more challenging possibility for those folks.”

Seitz believes it’s unreasonable to think the state wouldn’t revisit such major policies.  “You show me a business that adopted a 20 year business plan in 2008 and never revises it over the next 20 years and I’ll eat my hat. This is what happens all the time in the real world. Plans—be they business plans or government plans—are constantly being revised to account for changes in circumstances that have occurred in that time.”

New bill language is scheduled to be officially introduced during a Senate committee meeting Wednesday.

Tags

Energy, Government/Politics, Science, Technology

Leave a Comment

Please follow our community discussion rules when composing your comments.