Thursday, February 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM
Members of an Amish church group are due to appear in a Cleveland federal court, this Friday, to be sentenced for committing hate crimes against other Amish. The 16 parishioners were convicted last fall of forcibly shearing the beards and long hair of their perceived enemies, in an effort to shame them. David C. Barnett has more on the legal and personal aftermath of those attacks.
Like many brides, Lizzie Miller will never forget her wedding day. It took place last Thanksgiving and her father conducted the ceremony.
LIZZIE MILLER: I didn’t want anyone else to perform the marriage.
But, unlike most brides, Lizzie Miller had to travel to the federal prison in Youngstown, Ohio, to speak her vows. That’s where her father, Amish bishop Samuel Mullet, is awaiting sentencing on conspiracy charges.
LIZZIE MILLER: It was the most bittersweet thing I’ve ever experienced.
Miller is Mullet’s youngest daughter, one of nearly 140 church members who live in an isolated farming community in the Eastern Ohio town of Bergholz. The 67-year-old Amish elder was largely silent during the trial, as witnesses testified to being terrorized by the hair-cutting attacks, carried out by members of the Bergholz group. Beards on men and long hair on women carry great religious symbolism among the Amish, and although Samuel Mullet was never accused of participating in the assaults, federal prosecutors said he was the mastermind. Lizzie Miller and her family are now braced for a range of sentencing possibilities.
LIZZIE MILLER: We are expecting anywhere from bond to life.
Ohio is home to the nation’s largest Amish population, and the spectacle of this reclusive group on trial in a federal courtroom attracted international attention. All along, Mullet and his followers claimed the attacks stemmed from an internal dispute that got out of hand. The defense has asked the judge for leniency, arguing that the victims weren’t seriously injured. Case Western Reserve University law professor Jonathan Entin doesn’t think the judge will buy that argument.
JONATHAN ENTIN: It’s hard to say that this was just a conflict within the group and we should just let it pass. Something really bad happened here, and whatever the appropriate criminal sentence ought to be, it’s hard to say that we should just look the other way.
Entin notes that since the assaults involved forcible restraint of the victims, federal sentencing guidelines give the judge a great deal of discretion in determining the appropriate punishment. Despite the unusual nature of this case, Ohio State University legal scholar Douglas Berman thinks it probably will set an important precedent.
DOUGLAS BERMAN: No matter how insular your community, no matter how unique the kind of criminal activity is within that community, the federal government has a strong interest --- and will go to court to protect that interest --- in applying national laws.
Sam Mullet and eight of his co-conspirators are being held in Youngstown. The rest, including six women, are out on bail so that they can attend to their families and work back in Bergholz.
As her teenaged nephew hammers a hook into a barn wall, Lizzie Miller says the young ones have stepped up to handle the daily chores of the missing men, although everyone knows that --- even behind bars --- her father is still in charge.
LIZZIE MILLER: He’s still the leader. He’s still dad. He’s still the bishop.
And no matter what the judge decides on Friday, Miller says she hasn’t lost faith in Sam Mullet.
Please follow our community discussion rules when composing your comments.